Rep Labs Fitness Get the app

Do You Really Need 10,000 Steps a Day? What the Research Says

No. In a pooled analysis of 15 studies covering 47,471 adults, the drop in risk of death that came with more steps leveled off at about 6,000 to 8,000 steps a day for people 60 and older, and 8,000 to 10,000 for younger adults. The 10,000 figure likely started as the name of a 1965 pedometer, not as a research finding. If you're well below those numbers, adding steps is worth it.

The short answer: no, but more steps still help

Ten thousand steps isn't a bad goal. It just isn't a threshold you have to cross to get the benefit.

For risk of death, the big studies show the same pattern. Risk falls fastest at the low end, when people go from very few steps to a moderate amount, and then the curve flattens out.1,2 Where it flattens depends partly on your age. A 2025 review of many health outcomes linked 7,000 steps a day to large benefits compared with 2,000.3

Where did 10,000 steps come from?

Not from a study. In their 2019 paper, I-Min Lee and colleagues at Harvard Medical School wrote that the goal's origin is unclear. They said it likely comes from the trade name of a pedometer sold in Japan in 1965, a name that translates to "10,000 steps meter."1

The round number stuck. As the same paper notes, it is now widely repeated in the press and is often the default goal on wearables and phones.

What does the research actually show?

The 2019 study of older women

Lee's team analyzed 16,741 women from the long-running Women's Health Study who wore a step-counting device for a week. Their average age was 72. Over an average of 4.3 years of follow-up, 504 of them died.1

  • The least active quarter of women took a median of 2,718 steps a day. The next quarters took 4,363, 5,905 and 8,442.
  • Compared with the least active group, risk of death was 41% lower in the second group, 46% lower in the third and 58% lower in the most active, after adjusting for other health factors.
  • Risk kept falling as steps went up, until about 7,500 a day. After that it leveled off.
  • Walking faster wasn't clearly linked to lower risk once total steps were taken into account.

Its limits: this is an observational study, so it shows a link, not cause and effect. People who are already unwell tend to walk less, and the authors say that kind of reverse causation can't be ruled out. Steps were measured for a single week. The women were mostly white, better off than average, and more active than a national sample of women their age.

The 2022 meta-analysis of 47,471 adults

Paluch and colleagues combined 15 groups of adults from the US, Europe, Japan, Australia and a multinational study, with each group analyzed the same way.2 The 47,471 people had an average age of 65, and 68% were women. They were followed for a median of 7.1 years, and 3,013 died.

  • The four step groups took a median of 3,553, 5,801, 7,842 and 10,901 steps a day.
  • Compared with the lowest group, risk of death was 40%, 45% and 53% lower in the next three groups.
  • For adults 60 and older, the benefit leveled off at about 6,000 to 8,000 steps a day. For adults under 60, it leveled off at about 8,000 to 10,000.
  • Pace gave mixed results. After accounting for total steps, a person's fastest 30 minutes of walking in the day was still linked to lower risk, but total minutes spent walking briskly were not.

Its limits: every study in it was observational, and the authors state plainly that causal inferences can't be made. Steps were measured once, it looked only at death, and more than 70% of participants were white.

The 2025 review of other health outcomes

Death isn't the only thing that matters, so a 2025 review in The Lancet Public Health looked wider. Ding and colleagues gathered 57 studies from 35 groups of adults and compared 7,000 steps a day with 2,000.3

  • Risk of death was 47% lower (pooled from 14 studies).
  • Risk of heart and blood vessel disease was 25% lower (six studies).
  • Risk of dementia was 38% lower (two studies).
  • Depressive symptoms were 22% less likely (three studies).

For death, heart disease, dementia and falls, the curves bent at around 5,000 to 7,000 steps. For a few other outcomes, including depressive symptoms and type 2 diabetes, risk kept falling in a straight line as steps rose. The authors concluded that 10,000 is still a fine target for people who are already active, but 7,000 brings meaningful benefits and may be more realistic for some.

Its limits: most outcomes rest on only a handful of studies, the analysis couldn't look at age groups separately, and like the others, it can't fully rule out other explanations for the links.

How many steps a day should you aim for?

Use the research as a range, not a pass-or-fail line. The table below is our guidance, built on where risk leveled off in these studies. It isn't a tested program. Check your phone or watch for your average over a normal week first.

Your current daily averageA sensible next goalWhy
Under 4,000Add about 1,000 a day, hold it for a couple of weeks, then add againIn both mortality studies, the biggest difference in risk was between the least active group and the next one up
4,000 to 6,000Build toward about 7,000In the 2025 review, the curves for death, heart disease and dementia bent at around 5,000 to 7,000
6,000 to 8,000Age 60 or over: hold it. Under 60: build toward 8,000 to 10,000Where the benefit leveled off for each age group in the 2022 analysis
8,000 or moreKeep it. Under 60, 10,000 is a reasonable stretch. Put new effort into strength training and harder cardioRisk of death leveled off by about 8,000 for older adults and about 10,000 for younger ones

Going up gradually lines up with WHO guidance, which says some activity is better than none and that people should start small and build frequency, intensity and duration over time.4

Are steps enough exercise on their own?

Steps are a handy way to measure how much you move, but they aren't the whole picture. The WHO's 2020 guidelines ask adults for 150 to 300 minutes a week of moderate aerobic activity, or 75 to 150 minutes of vigorous activity. They also recommend muscle-strengthening work for all major muscle groups on two or more days a week.4

A step count says nothing about that second part. Someone who hits 9,000 steps but never does any strength work is still missing a piece the guidelines call out on its own. If you're new to it, see your first 12 weeks of lifting.

Walking can also be a stepping stone to running. If that's your next goal, Rep Labs has running plans that start at couch-to-5K, paced off your current fitness, with GPS and a voice coach. Our guide to going from zero to 30 minutes of running covers the first weeks.

Easy ways to add steps

These are small enough to repeat every day:

  • Take a short walk after one or two meals a day.
  • Walk during phone calls instead of sitting.
  • Park at the far end of the lot, or get off transit a stop early.
  • Take the stairs for a floor or two.
  • Walk to errands that are close enough.
  • Make one weekend walk longer than usual.

Pick one or two you'll actually stick with. The studies measured average daily steps across a week, so what you do on a typical day matters more than one big day.

What this research can't tell you

All three studies found links, not proof. Healthier people tend to walk more, and the authors acknowledge that adjusting for other factors can't fully remove that.2 Most participants were middle-aged or older, so the numbers for young adults are the least certain. And step counts were usually measured over a single week, which may not reflect years of habits.

Still, the direction is consistent across tens of thousands of people: going from very few steps to a moderate amount is linked to a large drop in risk, and you don't need to reach 10,000 to get most of it.

Questions people also ask

Is 5,000 steps a day enough?

It is a real improvement on 2,000 to 3,000 steps. In a study of older women, about 4,400 steps a day was already linked to lower risk of death than about 2,700. But in most studies risk kept falling until roughly 6,000 to 8,000 steps for older adults and more for younger ones, so treat 5,000 as a base to build on.

Do running steps count toward my daily steps?

Yes. The studies used devices worn through the day that counted steps of every kind, walking or running. Running is also vigorous exercise, and WHO guidance treats 75 to 150 minutes of vigorous activity a week as equal to 150 to 300 minutes of moderate activity.

Is walking more than 10,000 steps a day bad for you?

Nothing in these studies points that way. Risk of death leveled off at high step counts rather than rising again, and a 2025 review called 10,000 a day a viable target for people who are already active.

Does walking faster matter more than step count?

The evidence is mixed. In older women, walking speed didn't clearly matter once total steps were counted. In a larger meta-analysis, a person's fastest 30 minutes of walking was still linked to lower risk, but total minutes at a brisk pace were not. Total steps is the more consistent signal.

Sources

  1. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Kamada M, et al. (2019). Association of step volume and intensity with all-cause mortality in older women. JAMA Intern Med 179(8):1105-1112.
  2. Paluch AE, Bajpai S, Bassett DR, et al. (2022). Daily steps and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of 15 international cohorts. Lancet Public Health 7(3):e219-e228.
  3. Ding D, Nguyen B, Nau T, et al. (2025). Daily steps and health outcomes in adults: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health 10(8):e668-e681.
  4. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, et al. (2020). World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med 54(24):1451-1462.